Some critics object that AI is impossible, while others object that it
is too possible and that ultraintelligent machines pose a
threat. Which of these objections do you think is more likely? Would it
be a contradiction for someone to hold both positions?
Some critics object that AI is impossible, while others object that it is too possible and that ultraintelligent machines pose a threat. Which of these objections do you think is more likely? Would it be a contradiction for someone to hold both positions?